Cheshire East Council has issued a stinging open letter to the Secretary of State for Housing strongly criticising his decision to grant a planning appeal in the borough.
The council has formally written to secretary of state for housing, communities and local government, Robert Jenrick – expressing ‘dismay’ at his ruling to permit the development of up to 189 homes at Stapeley, near Nantwich.
The letter says the decision is a ‘significant blow’ to public confidence in the planning system, ‘undermines the principles of effective plan making’ and will ‘likely lead to a further scramble for developers to seek permission for other unplanned sites’.
In their joint open letter to Mr Jenrick, Councillor Sam Corcoran, the leader of Cheshire East Council, and Councillor Toni Fox, the council’s cabinet member for planning, said: “Cheshire East has embraced the need to deliver appropriate level of housing across the borough with a Local Plan target of 36,000 homes over the plan period to 2030 – which is well over household projections for the area.
“For the last two years, Cheshire East has seen more than 3,000 housing completions – the highest figures ever recorded in Cheshire East. It puts the borough among the highest-performing councils for house building investment.
“This council has a very robust housing land supply and is on target to deliver that housing in a planned and sustainable manner by also bringing forward the delivery of supporting infrastructure in accordance with our adopted Local Plan Strategy.
“We are, therefore, dismayed by your decision to allow the planning appeal at Stapeley, despite the clear conflict with development plan policies on the grounds that it delivers more housing.
“Many thousands of Cheshire East residents have engaged in the Local Plan process over many years and have also been involved in the development of more than 30 neighbourhood plans across the borough. Your decision to place such significant weight on the delivery of housing undermines the principles of effective plan making.
“It will leave many, particularly around Nantwich, to question why they bothered. The decision flies in the face of the government’s stated commitment to a plan-led system.
“Cheshire East is an area promoting substantial plan-led growth, yet it is still vulnerable to unplanned, speculative housing development. The public’s confidence that up-to-date plans provide certainty as to what development they will see take place in their local area has taken a significant blow.
“Your decision will inevitably have further consequences and will likely lead to a further scramble for developers to seek permission for other unplanned sites.
“This will not only cause further disquiet for residents but also risks diverting valuable resources away from making progress on allocated site applications, causing delay to the very sites which would be able to deliver housing in a timely manner. It is notable that it will be 10 years from application submission for this site to actually deliver any beneficial housing.”
Cheshire East marks Carers Week by celebrating unpaid carers
Man jailed for 18 years for sexual offences against girls
Congleton Gears Up for Biggest Food & Drink Festival Yet
Teenager sentenced after raping girl in Crewe
Two men charged following disorder in Crewe
Council welcomes continued progress in Ofsted monitoring visit
Community Asked to Help Spruce Up Congleton Ahead of Britain in Bloom Judging
Staffordshire woman charged with attempted murder
Macclesfield Road in Rainow opens following major repair works
Riseley House Care Home in Macclesfield
Family pay tribute to "full of light" teenager who was found dead at Pickmere Lake
Man jailed for sexually assaulting multiple women across Cheshire and Manchester
E-bikes and scooters seized following road safety day of action across Crewe
Care professionals and nurses kick off for local NHS charity at Macclesfield Football Club
The Mayor of Knutsford launches first two fundraising events
Local eight-year-old running 90km to support Macclesfield Hospital’s Children’s Ward
Comments
Add a comment